The new Michael Jackson?
A great performance at Britain's Got Talent.
Login to rate this video.
Embed this video
Send to a friend
This video has, amongst others, been embedded on forums.minus-fanera.com (more info).
Comments
23 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.
3 Posted 555 days ago by zeidmaan
I could do better with my eyes closed... NOT
One of the best acts I saw on that show so far. Plus it takes balls to pretend to be a pedo ![]()
8 Posted 554 days ago by regata4
ahh.... thats great performance... you guyz should watch a couple of minutes after that... the judges reaction and their questions etc
9 Posted 554 days ago by moskwiz
Well the camera operators for this clip should be hanged, ripped to 4 pieces and be decapacitated =)
But yeah.. from what little I could see it seems that that guy could dance pretty well.
11 Posted 554 days ago by sfgiantpoet
having a bad day. take two of these and call me when you cant funk no mo' ![]()
12 Posted 554 days ago by cannnobaL
To be a "next" genius you have to actually be a genius, not to copy sm1 else.
He's alright at that tho.
15 Posted 554 days ago by dave9191
why do they always cut off the judges feedback on these sort of clips... ![]()
16 Posted 554 days ago by xlynx
search for "talent signature jackson" youknow where and watch the version posted by alexlmlo, as some are missing the intro questions as well as the trailing comments.
17 Posted 554 days ago by AMERICANandPROUD
He is a good dancer, but Michael Jackson is an original. This guy can't be the "next" Michael because he is just copying his style, but he can mimic him very well.
(Let's just hope he doesn't sleep with little boys as well.) ![]()
19 Posted 553 days ago by BombDiggady (moderator)
Lol, that was really, really good!
I didn't like the multiple camera editing though ![]()
20 Posted 553 days ago by zeidmaan
watching it again I agree, the camera and editing is bullcrap. They never show more than 2 seconds of the act ![]()



1 Posted 555 days ago by Mix
haha very nice
Brilliant!