I guess he is happy about the U.S. going to war on everyone.

#1 Everyone? How about just terrorist supporting countries. Australia just had a little taste of
Islamic terror today, time to stamp it out.

#1 and also on everything, war on terror, war on drugs, war on poverty, . They just love their wars in murrica. It seems to be the only tool they know for solving any type of problem.

#3 ahm, war on poverty? are you sure we are talking about the same country?

Typical! you get a video of a double amputee trying to use a skateboard and the idiot brigade turn the COMMENTS section into slating America. Some really dumb comments here as well "war on Poverty" (as already mentioned by #4) #3 your comments make no sense what so ever War is what happens when the talking hasn't worked or when the opposing conversationalists are too brain washed (usually in an excuse for a religion) to hold a conversation. IRMC

Dude skates better than I do! well done that man........

#5 if you are so found of injured ( disabled ) war veterans and you have any respect for them you would be looking for a solution that will make less of injured/disabled/suicidal veterans, not reciting another "why is war necessary" speech you've heard on tv, just saying...

Are you sure that isn't Corporal Clegg?

#7 I guess once the planes have been hijacked and flown into civilian buildings and trains and buses with innocent passengers have been blown up and aid workers are beheaded with their hands tied behind their backs and 140 innocent children are shot and killed in their own school it's a sign that your enemy is not up for communication. If you have a solution to stop all this I'm sure the world is all ears. I have not, just saying...

#9 if you "have not" then don't give us another "why war is necessary" speeches, we all know what terrorists are doing, but i'm sure that every of the terrorist you mentioned definitely agrees with your dick cheney and his methods. you can also give me "who started it first" speech. it doesn't matter at the end, from outside your narrow view they are both doing the same, killing and torturing innocent people...

also, for your reference, what #3 was talking about makes perfect sense ( george carlin and his "we like war!" )

#10 That will be a "I don't have a solution" answer then I guess. For the record that's not how you spell Dustman either.

so, for the record, you do support your government torturing innocent people in prisons like guantanamo ( without a fair trial and a lawyer )? because believe it or not, part of the people imprisoned there are innocent.
if you do, say "guantanamo" at loud and remember how it sounds, because that is a sound of you "Judge-Jake" ( whereabouts known to N S A ) giving up your own freedom for a small grain of security

i'm not questioning IF we need to fight terrorists ( we, as a whole world ), but i'm by all means questioning HOW some countries are doing it

( there is also a saying: "when you have no valid argument, reach for grammar/spelling, it works like a charm" )

#12 It isn't "torture" if when it is over you can get up and walk away , unlike the torture used in many other countries that leave people either dead or maimed and blind for life.
The prisoners taken to Guantanamo were enemy combatants captured on the battlefield , not innocent civilians.

well mate, apparently you didn't read the reports about the methods used as well as who was taken to guantanamo in addition to "enemy combatants" ( many civilians that where "SUSPECTED" to have important informations where taken there )

people who know a bit of a history can recognize true meaning of "guantanamo". once you are in a position to say "it's ok to torture the enemy" you are opening the door to grater evils, and you are giving up your own freedom to fair trial because the main idea behind it is that everyone can be "the enemy", even you...

The methods used? Loud noise,sleep deprivation,the famous Irrigation for Information Act. Always a doctor present and no one was murdered or had their head cut off.

#15 that sounds like a commercial for "bud light" and has as much truth in it...
what really bothers me is that you are not seeing a problem in torturing people in 21st century, and you are probably calling yourself "civilized"...

Well you are going to have to get over being "bothered" about that. Unlawful enemy combatants are not covered by the Third Geneva convention since they wear civilian clothes instead of a uniform with a country designation and they were captured on the battlefield. In addition they are subject to trial and punishment by military tribunals where they can receive the death penalty.
They could have just been shot as spies like in other wars , and I wish they had been since most of them have returned to their evil ways. The guy running ISIS had been held and then let out of Camp Bucca in Iraq, and now just look at all the thousands of innocents his extremist group have tortured (REAL torture), raped , murdered and beheaded.
And again , It isn't "torture" if when it is over you can get up and walk away. In a recent poll in the US 51% of Americans agree with that , 26% disagree and the rest had no opinion.

i'm afraid you are missing the point mate...
"isn't a torture if you can walk away", really? did you know that after http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding you can walk away? if you don't break your own bones in the process off curse
are you sure you would like to be interrogated by "isn't a torture if you can walk away" method, for let's say being in the wrong place at the wrong time?

i've heard a lot of republican bs in my life, but "isn't a torture if you can walk away" is the mother of all bs

Being on the battlefield with a weapon while fighting in support of al Qaeda does not qualify for "being in the wrong place at the wrong time".
Discussing this old topic with you is starting to feel like torture to me ,so I'm done. Peace