he has to have a sticker saying not eject with the blades working

Blah Blah smackity blah... yada yada yada ,that not a copter mate ! This is a Copter!


https://youtu.be/gK07Oi0omZI

I like the next video better

#3 IKR but we were on the subject of heli's
watching it now wow!

#1 Come on. It's done automatically, of course. 3:43

Shouldn't this be in a new category called "Propaganda "?

The butterflies at 10:04 fly pretty good too

Why do I have to watch youtube from 6:31 ?

Can't see the point of ejector seats, can you imagine living to tell your commander that you just lost one of these. Siberia is fecking cold

#5 it's a joke sherlock holmes

#2 or you are a kid or brainwashed american.. this thing would bxxchslap your prehistoric moneyhog with its 66% capability.. the next thing would be that you would claim same thing about american 'fighter' plane??? omg!!! the only weapon where USA army is competitive comparing to Russian is their tank, nowhere else. and I am not Russian, I just read and research a lot non biased info. omg to even think for a second in your direction is a misery.

#11 Where do you find non-biased info in Slovenia? Where has the KA-52 proven itself in combat?
Because of the greater number of moving parts and its complexity, the coaxial rotor system is more prone to mechanical faults and possible failure.Coaxial helicopters are also more prone to the "whipping" of blades and blade self-collision ,which caused the crash and death of Russian Maj. Gen. Boris Vorobyov.The cause of the accident was attributed to the helicopter's co-axial rotor blades hitting each other during hard manoeuvring.

#12 I forgot.. u are right, this model has no battle info.. and even if it would have comparable battles like Apachee - shooting on sheepherders, children and reporters from a mile far - it is not really a battle, huh? today a lot is done with computer simulations..
also f35 and sukhoi never met in war, tnx god, yet whole world was writing about how it was easy for sukhoi planes to own military exercises, they said as easy as clubbing baby seals.
but I guess u have read this one when it was still fresh.

Yep , "sheepherders, children and reporters" who are carrying RPGs and assault weapons do come under fire in a war zone.They should be more careful. Ask the Iraqi Republican Guard if the Apaches were "computer simulations".
In air to air combat the sukhoi pilot would be history before he even knew the F-22 Raptor had targeted him.
Russians build things on the cheap and put them into use before they are fully tested. That's why there are so many dead cosmonauts orbiting the earth from the 1960's and '70's.

#14 regarding the radar-lock... Sukhois lock targets at 200 miles, don't talk crap when you know nothing about it.
Those reporters that you are talking about afterall had cameras, twoof them.. others had NOTHING. That was the final result of researches, the story you've heard was just on american news, nowhere else.

About the fighterplane tests and results I swear are not written by morxns like me and you, but by people that know their work and the babyseal clubbing included also those f22 planes that you love so much, not just f35.. those were going up against russian and chineese fighterplanes. Why you think canadians decided not to go for f35?
Why you include some aerospace accidens only you know, i dont need to go into spaceshuttle, you are well enough informed i bet.

Slow-venian , radar lock only works if the target can be detected. The F-22 has a radar signature of a small bird which means an opposing plane will not even know its there until the missile hits him. F-35 is the same way but it was not built to be a dog-fighter like the F-22.Its main mission is to attack targets inside hostile air-space without being detected.
The Canadians elected a new left-wing leader who is pulling back any plans to help fight ISIS in the Middle East and other places and feels a lesser fighter jet is all that is needed to protect just Canada's sovereign air space. They now use the F-18 Super Hornet and will probably purchase more of them. Canada is certainly not looking to buy Russian or Chinese fighters but will hold open competition to include Boeing's F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, the Eurofighter Typhoon ,Saab Gripen NG , and Dassault's Rafale.

http://news.usni.org/2015/11/25/canadian-participation-in-f-35-program-remains-murky-u-s-hopes-for-open-competition-for-cf-18-replacement

#16 Yee yee.. I never said canada will buy russian, I also know why they will never, you obviously don't.
F-18 is finally a good plane. I Admit.

Now please (if you are interested afterall) read about this "stealth" of yours and do it where infopaganda from best propaganda machine (country) didn't reach yet.

I don't need to waste any more of my time with you, since you are obviously TOTALY BRAINWASHED.. You don't know nothing about that "stealth" gimmick, You don't know much about world politics, that make u do such sharp conclusions and you don't know much about one country that means so much to you.. You don't care about the truth, you care what it sounds/looks like.
AND I bet my IQ beats your by few ten points by just looking at how you think.

Someting about this slow... I used to like this slow-thing, I even used it as a nickname decade ago, would u belive it... but it does sound a bit ironic when someone obviously slo trys to be funny with it. Yuck!

Do you think that canada would ever even start with F-18s years ago if they wouldn't be a part of this "coalition of the willing" world-raping machine?? If it would be neighbouring to lets say India?? LoL You are a peace of wood, you know..
Probably you never even heared something so trivial and as strange as: "WTC 1 and WTC 2 were terrorized to the core by some miracle on the same day as the WTC 7 was being demolished"... and you belive all the rest as well... the country that did not invent lies yet.

#17 Lack of proper research has given you a lack of the facts.
You might want to take a look at what the "test" you keep referring to really was , and it wasn't
an air-to-air dogfight.The F-35 used in the test was just a test airframe used for testing certain flight
characteristics of the plane but the avionics that go into production F-35's had not been installed.
Let me know what you think after watching this....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TNaOE4Tjr4

@ sux2bu I am back, my luv.. I started to watch and couldn-t countinue... it clear that its about that infopaganda and so on...

Ye part of my idea came from that coputer test... the rest came from american scientist that probably knows more then all of us together here on this site.
Check on youtube, somthing about f35 being a duck...

Regardless that youtube is the worst place for the truth.. HF!