Full auto Glock
The perfect solution for when your pistol runs out of bullets 
Login to rate this video.
Embed this video
Send to a friend
This video has, amongst others, been embedded on videosecharges.blogspot.com (more info).
Comments
42 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.
you can get a skin for that gun in CS
5 Posted 385 days ago by MsZoomy (admin)
I'm surprised the thing didn't melt!! Cool but completely useless and totally redneck!
1 
Monkey Head for ingenuity and coolness factor
6 Posted 384 days ago by Fergus_Thedog
You want guns in your society, you have guns in your society, now all of you yanks forfeit the right to ever complain when you get shot while just going about your daily business, ok? On the flip side, I won't complain when I have nothing to fire at invading armies. I know which is more likely.
7 Posted 384 days ago by Oldfart
@#6 I have always thought of OZ as being kind of like the old American wild west,rugged people and individualsm. Now I have heard that Australians voted to give up their right to own guns....is that true?
11 Posted 384 days ago by patriotaus (moderator)
#7 you have to have a gun license to own a gun, unlike america where they sell guns to anyone, in australia we would like to keep the guns out of serial killers hands, out of mental retards.
There is no point to owning a gun if no one else has them. that is what is good about australia its safe.
the right to life will always trump the ability for every idiot/racist/drunk/druggo/mental retard to own a gun. if you want to play army, join the army
13 Posted 384 days ago by Oldfart
@#11 Don't you hunt game or target shoot down under? If a drug crazed home-invader breaks out your window to come inside wouldn't you like a trusty .357 Mag in your hand to stop him?
Guns don't do ALL the killing,hell the most famous Aussie in history was killed by a sting-ray. 
16 Posted 383 days ago by moskwiz
#13 I think what #11 was trying to say that if the drug-crazed home invader doesn't have a gun himself, then you won't really need a gun to stop him..
A society will only go as bad as are the rules it is governed by..
I think that the obvious connection between U.S gun-laws and it's absurd crime-rate is not very hard to piece together 
17 Posted 383 days ago by BombDiggady (moderator)
I do think that there should be a licensing system set up for the US.
I would be willing to sacrifice convenience to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on guns.
Although there will always be a black market for guns.
18 Posted 383 days ago by hxjohn
i like it where can i buy one there is a dog on lake garden city udon thani thailand that would sleep a lot better with a gut full 
john brook www.udonthani.co.uk
19 Posted 383 days ago by USAnumber1
@#16 On the surface that sounds like a reasonable argument but in a real life situation you might find that an amped-up 250 pound man who is wide awake and dangerous is more than a 180 pound man who has just woke-up can handle. So he beats you to death or stabs you to get you out of the way and now he can have fun with your wife and kids.
Criminals will always find a way to get guns and they for sure are never going to register them. The private citizen who owns guns is not the problem yet he is the one who is most affected by gun-control laws. Australia has never had a constitution that guarantees citizens the right to own guns , even before the buy-back program of 1997. Only certain approved groups were "allowed" that freedom. You should fear the government that fears an armed populace:
>
> A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
>
>
> In 1929, the Soviet Union
> established gun control.
>
> From 1929 to
> 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend
> themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
> ------------------------------
>
> In 1911,
> Turkey established gun control.
>
> From 1915
> to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend
> themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
> ------------------------------
>
> Germany
> established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945,
> a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable
> to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> China established gun control in 1935.
>
> From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political
> dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded
> up and exterminated
> ------------------------------
>
> Guatemala
> established gun control in 1964.
>
> From 1964
> to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend
> themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
> ------------------------------
>
> Uganda
> established gun control in 1970.
>
> From 1971
> to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend
> themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
> ------------------------------
>
> Cambodia
> established gun control in 1956.
>
> From 1975
> to 1977, one million educated' people, unable to
> defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
>
> -----------------------------
>
> Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in
> the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
>
20 Posted 383 days ago by moskwiz
I'm just trying to point out that a gun in his hand will more probably lead an uneducated poor fool to crime than if it was prohibited by law.. by god, the statistics have proven it many times over..
Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't most of the incidents described above political/governmental (and domestic war) incidents? Are you telling me that if the (a crude example) US government and army decided to start exterminating US civilians, then they could actually fend for themselves, because they have the ''liberty'' to carry firearms? Come on...
This amendment might have had some reasonable basis to stand upon back in it's day when USA was still largely country-side, trouble with Natives or whatnot.. It is clear, right now this law is only making things worse for you guys...
21 Posted 383 days ago by USAnumber1
#20 Well I don't believe a gun turns anyone into a criminal but it does make a criminal more deadly which is why I choose to stay armed.
Yes the above atrocities were committed by governments after gun-control laws were in-acted to 'protect the people from gun violence'. Then the gov was free to round-up those who opposed them or were different and dispose of them without a fight.
The second amendment to our constitution was added just for the reason that if our gov became tyrannical then the 'people' could take a stand against it as was done when the Americans booted King George's army and politicians out of our country. If our gov tried to use our own military against the populace you would see the military turn against the gov.
With freedoms come risks and this country will always stay armed.We just do our best to lock-up the predators who commit crime.
But again don't any of you go hunting for deer or geese or at least go target shooting for fun? Shooting clay pigeons with my 12 gauge 8-shot pump shotgun is a ball. You all ought to try it sometime.
22 Posted 383 days ago by moskwiz
No.. we don't.. we get our laughs and entertainment from seeing people, having parties, READING BOOKS etc.. You know.. the 'geeky' solution
Quote [The second amendment to our constitution was added just for the reason that if our gov became tyrannical then the 'people' could take a stand against it as was done when the Americans booted King George's army and politicians out of our country.]
->
wouldn't you say that that amendment has defeated its purpose then, by now?
Quote [We just do our best to lock-up the predators who commit crime.]
->
yup.. the US penal institution holds more people by now than is the total population of my country, plus 2 of my neighboring countries (the Baltic states) combined..
23 Posted 382 days ago by ruhk
here in Ohio ( USA ) you only need to register a gun if its A) a concealed carry weapon and B) if its fully automatic.
I own 3 guns, none of which are registered in my name, none of which are illegal according to federal statutes.
24 Posted 382 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
#21 ---> "If our gov tried to use our own military against the populace you would see the military turn against the gov."
when the US enforces their implanted microchip (the dog chip) law, that will become very difficult. If rumors are correct, they are already implanting the military. Who knows what kind of control they will have (or already have).
26 Posted 382 days ago by USAnumber1
@# 24 Man have you been watching too many sci-fi movies! Starting in 1997 our military personnel were issued a new type of dog-tags to WEAR that has a computer-chip in it which stores much more medical information than just blood-type;this helps medics in the field to better treat the wounded. Information like X-rays,medical history and cardiograms can all be read in the field by the doctors using a small hand-held device.
27 Posted 380 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
#26 man you never heard of google? look up the words "verichip" , "RFID" and "Radio Frequency Identification"
but your right about one thing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pxjnl1yuXk&feature=related
28 Posted 380 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
and by the way, i know "the dog chip" might make you confused with dog tags, but what i was referring to was the fact that RFID tags, aka, the mark of the beast, are sold to the general public for implanting into animals like dogs
29 Posted 380 days ago by USAnumber1
@# 28 [ when the US enforces their implanted microchip (the dog chip) law, that will become very difficult. If rumors are correct, they are already implanting the military. Who knows what kind of control they will have (or already have).] There is no "implanted microchip law" for military or civilian populations in the US. Whatever 'rumors' you have heard are false. You indicate that the chip may have 'control' over the implanted person which of course it could not.(maybe you were joking about that possibility)
30 Posted 379 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
#29 its obvious you didn't google those keywords i told you, otherwise you wouldn't still be debating this. below are three links to videos of major news tv stations talking about it which is about 15 minutes total. i hope that makes your task of proper research less tedious.
the first video is from one major news station it talks about some of the dangerous side effects (3:33 min):
effects:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQMby-z7tGk
the second video has more videos from major news television channels (4:31):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dpj4HRmJFiU
the third video has some historical videos and more news videos (6:40):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKx1gLCQef8
so are you going to sacrifice 15 minutes of your life and admit to defeat or what?
31 Posted 379 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
furthermore, i think you will find this one interesting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlRrr4Gpz2E&feature=related
32 Posted 379 days ago by USAnumber1
@# 30 If you think I do not research everything I talk about then you are badly mistaken. All of what you referenced was already known to me and you are STILL WRONG that there is a "microchip implantation law" in the US. You said the chip might have "control" over the implanted person and that is false and not possible.We are not cattle who will have electrodes implanted in our heads to obtain mind control over us and cause us to act on command.Some companies are requiring certain employees to get the chip if they have access to sensitive areas of the company but Wisconsin is the first state passing legislation to prevent employers from requiring implantation.Tommy Thompson who is a past Gov. of Wisconsin and former Secretary of Heath and Human Services for the US was pushing for implantation for medical purposes,he said. He was also on Verichip's board of directors so he may have had a financial reason to push for it.
Don't be so paranoid,no one is going to show up at your door in the middle of the night with orders to implant you with anything.
By the way , I do not think watching edited news clips on Youtube is considered "proper research". Those "mark of the beast" scare tactics might work on some simple-minded people but not on most.
33 Posted 379 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
#32 whatever dude, you didnt seem to know about implanted microchips when you misunderstood what i was talking about and got rfid tags confused with
"science fiction" and medical dog tags (as stated in comment #26).
on a further note, i never once said that rfid tags have "control" over people in the means of "mind control". (although one of those vid links i
showed later may have implied ) when i say: "Who knows what kind of control they will have (or already have)." (as stated in comment #24 , i mean
exactly what i said. you shouldn't put words peoples mouths by claiming that i "imply" or that i "said" something which i did not. if you could,
refer back to a comment where i actually said or impied this
btw, for your information gps location, product/person identification and banking are all forms of control when it comes to implanted microchips. the
government also "control" people (non implant) by creating laws and regulations. you dont call that "control"? or perhaps your definition of
"control" is limited to mind control" (in which case, it would be you who watches too much science fiction).
some vids for you about implanting troops:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRveSffxPdI
oh, and youll love this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYUlCKFHeAQ&feature=related
for future reference, before you decide to trash what someone says, make sure you know what you are talking about!
34 Posted 379 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
yeah, and there's more.. on control and laws
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiJH8R-z-mA
as the saying goes:
you can bring a horse to water, but you cant make it drink.
35 Posted 379 days ago by USAnumber1
Let's break this down to it's simplest form:
# 1 You said (post 24)"when the US enforces their implanted microchip (the dog chip) law, that will become very difficult." So there you are stating that the US HAS such a law...it does not.
# 2 In that same statement you are saying that the military will find it difficult to oppose the gov because of the "control" the gov might have over them which to any sane person sounds like physical control of what they do. What do you think,that in a situation where the military is going to take the side of the civilians, that holding their last paycheck or making a new regulation is going to force the soldiers to obey the gov like you imply here: "btw, for your information gps location, product/person identification and banking are all forms of control when it comes to implanted microchips. the government also "control" people (non implant) by creating laws and regulations. you dont call that "control"? "
# 3 You reference a video that shows a bull and a cat that have each had "implants" done to them to control their actions or modify their behavior.You used that video to show what you meant by "control" and to shore-up your argument,correct?
# 4 You ref a video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRveSffxPdI
that shows some black guy with the Pentagon about a half mile behind him showing a paper that says a company wants the Pentagon to microchip the troops. Of course that company (Verichip) wants the gov to do that,they would stand to make millions in profit from such a decision.What you do not see is the Pentagon saying they are planning on doing it.
# 5 Your last video offering states that "by May 2008 you will not be able to board a plane without the National ID with microchip" and that is not true. Here it is November 2008 and no such law or requirement has been instituted.
The chip which is about twice the size of any grain of rice that I have ever seen is implanted just under the skin so it could easily be removed with minor discomfort if the need arose so I do not see it as being a problem and for medical info it is great. The GPS tracking capabilities of the RFID may even have some use in finding lost or wounded people but it would be a voluntary implant.
Are you a US citizen? Just curious
as the old saying goes:
sometimes you have to use a 2 x 4 to get the mule's attention.
36 Posted 378 days ago by Oldfart
I would sure like to see the answer to #35 sometime soon. Checkmate.
37 Posted 378 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
---> "CHECK!"
#36 first of all oldfart, im an expert chess player. which means i think many moves in advance, ive got a lot of tricks up my sleeve and i love a hard game. you saying check mate means absolutely nothing to me and certainly doesn't prove me wrong
1: lets get this clear: i stated that the law will be enforced, i never stated that it currently exists. the us have plans for many laws which currently do not exist. personally, i don't like the idea of implanted microchips. however, i am not going ignore it. personally, i believe they have plans for a law and yes it might be a rumor. obviously im not going to convince you otherwise because most people believe what they want to believe.
i WANT to believe that you are right, however, corrupt agendas and world history has shown that human nature is greedy, malicious, sinister and controlling. history will always repeat itself because people refuse to acknowledge history.
furthermore, i find it funny how you refuse to believe in the possibility that a law could be created for enforcing microchip implanting. the us create all kinds of laws concerning security related devices, in my opinion, the rfid tag is the holy grail of security devices. or is it "science fiction".
2: interesting point but a "sane" person would not take a "sane" comment and assume that it says something "insane". i can see how you could get confused by assuming that government having control over military personnel could only mean "physical control". there is multiple ways they could have control which might prevent retaliation (keep in mind, because i know how you like to assume alot, these methods are theoretical from a mechanical engineers point of view and do not imply actual systems or technologies): 1; rfd tags could provide gps location which might help track oppostion so that counter attacks could be executed (counter attacks could even be disguised as training operations). 2; people or military personnel could be shut off from the ability to buy or sell products if the rfid tags eventually replaced money, which is necessary to survive. 3; rdif tags could potentially identify people, as well as what possessions a person might be carrying if the possessions also contain rfid tags. this could give rfid controllers a strategic advantage.
a lot of Americans have ancestry heritage from Europe, which means that biologically they no different. when Hitler invaded Europe, little was done until the us came in with superior military systems and defeated them.
also, all of the people positioned within high ranking military organizations are likely to have interest in a: military weapons development, b: a global agenda for world conquest. it would take some kind of mass cooperation with all members of the military for there to be a successful retaliation.
besides, the government wont openly turn on the population because it is much easier for them to manipulate their way to conquest.
3: if you watched the video from start to finish and actually paid attention to what was being shown, you would have seen how rfid tags could be used to control aggression and other emotions. i get what you are trying to say, but i added that one because you fist mentioned the assumption of having "control" over a person. exact quote: "You indicate that the chip may have 'control' over the implanted person which of course it could not." is that enough "control" for ya? you should fast forward to the part which shows a cybernetics professor who attached an implant to his nervous system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKx1gLCQef8
4: you are correct. vericip will make billions (or more) from this. why wouldn't they want to do that? and you are also right that the videos don't show the pentagon saying that they are implanting troops. do you honestly think that they will tell you everything they are doing? the videos actually are just to show that news media have covered the topic of "implanting troops" regardless if they are speculations and proposals. for future reference, because i know you like to assume, the actual quote i said was "some vids for you about implanting troops:". when i make a comment, i mean exactly as i say, not what you assume i meant
5: first of all, the read id act does not go into detail about possible verichip laws (to avoid assumption ), however, it opens up a doorway for countless other similar laws to be created or implemented.
according to the wikipedia article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act ) "As of April 2, 2008, all 50 states have either applied for extensions of the original May 11, 2008 compliance deadline or received unsolicited extensions, meaning that the REAL ID Act will not become an issue at federal facilities and airports until December 31, 2009" this means that the act is postponed, thus explaining why "it is November 2008 and no such law or requirement has been instituted."
you'll like this vid... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCU2OJPZ4AM
6: "The chip which is about twice the size of any grain of rice that I have ever seen" the image you are probably talking about is actually a photograph of an older model. there is one that is almost identical to the size of a grain of rice and even one the size of a pinhead for tracking products.
"Are you a US citizen?" ----> to answer your question i am. to avoid confusion, i both love and support America and the existence an American government. i also support the world and believe in a future one world government. i do not support tyranny and corruption, no matter where it manifests.
i agree with you on the possibility of easy removal or deactivation but i don't know how.
it may be voluntary, but as history has shown, a devastating act like 9/11 can give dictators the power to do anything they want.
"sometimes you have to use a 2 x 4 to get the mule's attention." <------lol, likewise
to be honest dude, i really don't care what you think. it doesn't matter what i say because you will always debate it whether you are right or wrong.
don't expect a reply to this anymore because i already made my point and im finished wasting my time debating with you.
38 Posted 378 days ago by nooitaf
OMG .. the gun law BS again...
only pussies need guns.. guys use stones, beer bottles and other stuff you can throw at/on somebody to defend their families .. be creative.. ever seen 'home alone' ??
39 Posted 378 days ago by nooitaf
RFID + GPS + WORLDWIDE TRACKING in a rice corn ???
And there are actually people out there buying that hoax !?!?!?
The tracking devices that feds put under your car in 2008 barely fit in someones ass, so thinking about
a 'reliable' rice corn size chip is unbelievable and maybe even scientificly impossible.
for those who dont know...
GPS works only ONE-WAY ... and that way is DOWN TO EARTH.
The chip seen in the anti-verichip video (and other videos, cause that issue is quite old) only contains a number .. i guess ~16 digits. nothing more . just that 'unique' number. they also seem to be easy to copy, so they are not as reliable as a passport, not even close. good for pets but not for humans. we dont do eyescans of dogs, do we?
These chips only purpose is money, made with fear.
lol .. i did some research and bumped into this article May-2008
http://blog.wired.com/sterling/2008/05/arphid-watch-ve.html
Verichip seems to be out of the market.
it seems they sold in july.
Lets wait another 30 years before we can put a cellphone+gps-receiver in a rice corn that can actually 'talk' to a nearby tower 5km away without cooking your skin from the inside. I guess a P2P solution would be more realistic. Also that wouldn't work either if you are alone in the desert.
Actually if you got a mobile phone you are being tracked right now, so no chips needed. They are also good for survaliance, but thats a different story.
40 Posted 378 days ago by Oldfart
@# 39 Hey if Stanley Tools is now the maker of those RFID microchips then maybe they can start putting them in hand tools so I can figure-out where I left my screwdriver!
41 Posted 377 days ago by nooitaf
#40 actually that is what is going to happen next. every electric item is going to get a chip to store a number which you can use to get it's data. but even if we would assume that they would put it in screwdrivers too .. your system could only tell you that its in the shed, somewhere
42 Posted 377 days ago by zf1 (moderator)
#40 lol hahahaha inventory tracking software can do the same thing but cheaper
(23 votes)
1 Posted 385 days ago by NicknamePending
Now... Touch the barrel you pussy!