Underwater Creature Camouflage
Login to rate this video.
Embed this video
Send to a friend
This video has, amongst others, been embedded on b00red.com (more info).
Comments
20 comments posted so far. Expand all comments Login to add a comment.
17 
6. Comment rated too low. Show this comment Walter_Mitty 3 years ago
Let's see a show of hands here. How many of you really believe all these creatures are the result of random mutations?
33
7. eNdEmiOn06463 3 years ago
Amazing makes fictional shape-shifting immediately more plausible. 
#6 What are you suggesting? I hope not some sort of god like intervention? And yes I do believe its random. Have you ever heard of the ghost in the machine? Same randomness.
("There have always been ghosts in the machine . . . random segments of code that have grouped together to form unexpected protocols..."
36
i wish the octopus would make the transformers noise when it changes. KEE KEH KAH KOH KOO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8FgDmo_9sY
9
9. killingvirus 3 years ago
i wish i had one of those firework fish XD realy cool and the Camouflage of the octopus is really awesome to 
22
#6 You spoke my mind, and why didn't I say that before you did?
well, check your comment rating :/ so immature...
33
#6 they're not random mutations, their selective mutations..
.. and.. God, how I hate this format. Why do Americans have to make an action movie of everything -.-
17
13. Comment rated too low. Show this comment Walter_Mitty 3 years ago
#11 Give me one example of a mutation that resulted in new genetic information.
26
i wanted to get those octopus and cuttlefish for my saltwater tank but found out that i need a 100g+ tank and constant water changes because of the waste consumption...
oh well maybe in the future.
33
#13 Every mutation results in new genetic information by definition.. That's pretty much what mutation means, that a gene or a chromosome has changed because of something.
Mutations that are not harmful might be useful and if the specimen with a useful mutation is more successful in life than the other specimens without it, it might become favorable and that specimen could prevail as a dominant one. Other specimens would then start preferring to procreate with it rather than other specimens without the favorable mutation. This would go on until most of the specimens in the population had the new mutation thus rendering the old genome obsolete and voila, a new evolutionary version of the animal would be created.
Pretty hard to argue with that really.. Darwin or no Darwin.. besides I think trying to prove God with technology or scientific method (which is what creationism is) is a really dumb thing to do and it dampens faith as a whole.
God doesn't need to be proven of being the creator of all things. In my view, Darwinism or modern science doesn't even conflict with God in any way.. Mutations are one of the prime causes for evolution, now who created mutations, is another question altogether
17
18. Walter_Mitty 3 years ago
#16 Mutations never result in new information. Mutations may in some cases prove beneficial; but are always the result of damaged or missing genetic information.
1
19. DancingBuffalo 2 years ago
Now THAT is A~MAZING!~!!! Imagine the ALL the work going into capturing all this increadable footage!!!
(151 votes)
+24
1. Babinizats 3 years ago
That was so cool!