Speeding Camera Lottery
People who liked this video also liked
Comments
21 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.
38
3. dragonon commented 13 years ago
Before watching the video, just after reading speeding camera lottery, an idea occurred to me that government should pay people who drive at safe limits on average of that person.
Government can pay it by charging the over speeding lols...
guess what , video was same and PRACTICAL
I'm happy
Government can pay it by charging the over speeding lols...
guess what , video was same and PRACTICAL
I'm happy
27
4. Break-a-leg commented 13 years ago
One of the ways for people to change their behaviour is by rewarding good behaviour. If you only punish people for bad behaviour, their behaviour would not change. They just become more ambivalent towards trafficrules. This type of rewarding is called Behaviourism, and has the well known Dr. Pavlov and Dr. Skinner as foundingfathers.
This is a great way, and a great example, of behaviourism and its positive effects. Only the government does not wish to give up its income
This is a great way, and a great example, of behaviourism and its positive effects. Only the government does not wish to give up its income
17
5. elisson commented 13 years ago
I do think they agreed on This, i heard about this on the radio.
The police in Sweden are quite hard when its about speed limit 30km/h.
Due there is school or something simular nearby.
This was made Wolkswagen and NTF (Nationalorganisation for Trafic safty) or something simulair to that
The police in Sweden are quite hard when its about speed limit 30km/h.
Due there is school or something simular nearby.
This was made Wolkswagen and NTF (Nationalorganisation for Trafic safty) or something simulair to that
32
6. Teqskater commented 13 years ago
"Token economy" started when most of us where very little and got stickers for being nice troughout the day . It still works when we are adults. It's got to be rewarded for good things. Our society's focus on what we do wrong all the time but THAT perspective is wrong on it's own. That's my opinion.
67
7. sux2bu commented 13 years ago
I wonder if traffic congestion increased at the intersections where the lottery cameras were because of drivers going round and round the same block hoping to increase their odds of being a winner.
This lottery was a very good thing, in my town the traffic cameras can cost you a fine, but never give you a reward.
This lottery was a very good thing, in my town the traffic cameras can cost you a fine, but never give you a reward.
3
12. superbadassdude commented 13 years ago
DAMNIT whats up with all video with only a smiley under them??
Is the uploader too retarded to describe what the video is about?
Is the uploader too retarded to describe what the video is about?
29
13. MattiKattila commented 13 years ago
Go sweden!
45
16. snotraddict commented 13 years ago
I don't think the speed dropped because of the program encouraging good behavior. They did after all, give tickets to those that sped!
26
17. Mullemeck commented 13 years ago
#15 Speedcameras have always been about preveting people for speeding and in that way trying to stop an accident from happening. You couldn't be more wrong with your statement. I dont think you can say to the parents of whoms child just been run over by a car speeding on a 30-road "Atleast we got to fee the man who were speeding!". It's 30 because children cannot see the difference of fun and danger in early ages so they may run out into the streets and when youre traveling at a higher speed than 30 the stoping distance is beyond the child, that equals severe damage or death.
26
19. Mullemeck commented 13 years ago
#18 With early ages i mean like 4-6 year olds. In stockholm, where the footage is shot, there are many schools which lie by populated roads, hence the 30-limit. As it is a city there are playgrounds but usually not at the same place where the school is and the children must therefore travel by foot, often accompanied by an adult but you may oversee like 20 children and its not hard for one of them to get curious of something and run away. Everyone does not live in a suburb or in some village.
22
20. nomaddaf commented 13 years ago
Two things.....1) this not a test of the lottery aspect. You don't know if it was fear of the fine or desire of the prize. Bad science at best. you would first need to put up a camera and wait until the locals were used to it then see if adding an incentive changes behavior further. 2) it is fascinating to see how many of you good little socialists in the comments are so ready to fix a problem by redistributing wealth from the "guilty" to totally uninvolved parties and not to pay for the system you want to be in control in the first place. The world is truly going to hell. Our thought process is totally warped as it relates to cause and effect, right and wrong.
+42 1. Bobski commented 13 years ago
BUT I BET THE GOVERNMENT WON'T LIKE IT......I WONDER WHY!