Tactical innovations
People who liked this video also liked
Comments
37 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.
31
2. Daniellangille commented 13 years ago
0:30
Naaahhaahah
Naaahhaahah
35
3. AmazingNixxo commented 13 years ago
Power to the rednecks!
39
5. loscohones commented 13 years ago
bulletstorm
40
8. 13wallace13 commented 13 years ago
Hurray another sarcastic comment!
36
10. c0mmanderKeen commented 13 years ago
Hardly applicable, no need for such a thing, except for al capone remake..
26
11. gilezajner commented 13 years ago
You could KILL someone with that thingy
27
12. ValdeLevis commented 13 years ago
That's just an upper receiver that will allow you to "plink" with 22 L.R. as opposed to 5.56 X 45, a much costlier ammo. The manufacturer states that that this conversion will only work on registered receiver sear drilled M16 lowers. It WILL NOT work with drop-in auto sears or with lightning links, M16 ONLY, NOT AR15. For those of you that that don't "speak gun" this is a conversion for existing machine guns, not a new machine gun.
30
13. ruhk commented 13 years ago
#1 #6 This might be shocking so brace yourself. I am a gun owner. *GASP* I know! Shocking! Heres another shocking fact, I have not killed anyone! It defies logic doesnt it?
If you take away guns mankind will find another means of harming humanity. The gun laws that exist *CURRENTLY* are sufficient. Instead of pushing for additional restrictions *that only hurt those willing to obey the law ANYWAYS* why don't you encourage your representatives to enforce the laws on the books?
Im a gun owner and firearms enthusiast and I support enforcing the laws that exist now. There are a lot of laws on the books that are ignored by law enforcement, DA offices, and gun vendors. New laws only harm law abiding citizens.
Stop punishing the law abiding recreation/home defense/hunting gun owners.
<rant/>
#10 Athletes have ball games, shooters have gun sports. That crazy drum mag does have its place in the recreational shooting realm
#12 have you seen the .22lr gatling guns with 8 revolving barrels? Bitchin awesome.
If you take away guns mankind will find another means of harming humanity. The gun laws that exist *CURRENTLY* are sufficient. Instead of pushing for additional restrictions *that only hurt those willing to obey the law ANYWAYS* why don't you encourage your representatives to enforce the laws on the books?
Im a gun owner and firearms enthusiast and I support enforcing the laws that exist now. There are a lot of laws on the books that are ignored by law enforcement, DA offices, and gun vendors. New laws only harm law abiding citizens.
Stop punishing the law abiding recreation/home defense/hunting gun owners.
<rant/>
#10 Athletes have ball games, shooters have gun sports. That crazy drum mag does have its place in the recreational shooting realm
#12 have you seen the .22lr gatling guns with 8 revolving barrels? Bitchin awesome.
36
14. Chrisofskjern commented 13 years ago
The Tommygun. RELOADED!
36
15. armageddon commented 13 years ago
rapid fire is very inaccurate
27
16. ValdeLevis commented 13 years ago
#13 I've seen videos of the baby gatling guns you mentioned, but I'm more familiar the M61 and it's variants. 20 X 102 at 6600 rpm's (M61A2) is really "Bitchin' Awesome".
35
17. sacredmaniac commented 13 years ago
very slight recoil, i wonder how its accuracy considering high fire rate
42
18. GhostInShell commented 13 years ago
another invention for those who haven't learn to aim... what a waste of bullets.
47
19. Zebulun commented 13 years ago
That's what I'm talkin' about. Faster more powerful ways to kill terrorists bent on destroying peace and innocent lives.
To all you pacifists out there. Let me punch you in the face while you stand there and do nothing. I would say you could punch me back however, you're a pacifist so you're principles won't allow you to defend yourself.
Too bad for you
To all you pacifists out there. Let me punch you in the face while you stand there and do nothing. I would say you could punch me back however, you're a pacifist so you're principles won't allow you to defend yourself.
Too bad for you
38
21. version21 commented 13 years ago
#13: True, I could kill someone with a hammer or a kitchen knife, but thats not as easy as killing with a gun. Guns are made primarily for killing people. All of the school kill runs by children could not happen if they had no access to guns. You simply can't kill 20 people with a knife!
I think its a small price to pay to not play with killing tools just for fun to prevent useless death.
I know that many more people are killed by car accidents etc. but people drive cars for a reason.
And the argument you need a gun to protect your home and property is just ****.
I don't have a gun and hey: I'm still alive. If you have a gun to protect yourself your attacker will probably have one too. Too bad for those people having no guns: The attacker plans to attack -> has a gun and shoots you.
So its as simple as that: Less guns -> less useless death.
btw: I live in Germany where not nearly as many people have guns than in the US and we're pretty happy with that.
I think its a small price to pay to not play with killing tools just for fun to prevent useless death.
I know that many more people are killed by car accidents etc. but people drive cars for a reason.
And the argument you need a gun to protect your home and property is just ****.
I don't have a gun and hey: I'm still alive. If you have a gun to protect yourself your attacker will probably have one too. Too bad for those people having no guns: The attacker plans to attack -> has a gun and shoots you.
So its as simple as that: Less guns -> less useless death.
btw: I live in Germany where not nearly as many people have guns than in the US and we're pretty happy with that.
31
25. cincodemayo commented 13 years ago
.22 machine gun!
23
26. stupidbullshit commented 13 years ago
#13 in german there`s a name for this kind of weapon. it is called niederhaltewaffe... which means, I keep you and your "friends" in your hideout with this weapon... noone will ever come out, while someone shoots at him with this kinda shit. therefore it is called a TACTICAL innovation. so please don´t tell me, about your use of your weapons, i don´t f...ing care! this weapons are meant for a certain purpose... there are dead humans involved! so idiots like you should be the one in the hideout... it´s lunatic to argue in your way
36
28. c0mmanderKeen commented 13 years ago
#26 niederhaltewaffe ? I am german too and i have never heard that word xD what he means is suppresive fire.
30
29. ruhk commented 13 years ago
Im glad we can have a rational argument/discussion on this topic. (truly. no sarcasm in that)
#21 I disagree with your car comment. In it you seem to insinuate that guns have NO PURPOSE other than to murder. I would disagree. Hunting for sustenance is a pretty powerful reason for guns to exist, and before you say "well just use a bow and arrow then" I will point out that when its MY FAMILY that will starve when I miss the shot, I will use a gun that has a MUCH better chance at a successful second shot. Also, just because you have a gun doesnt mean your attacker will, and the opposite is true. just because you choose to be disarmed by your government, doesnt mean your potential attacker is also disarmed. Feel free to gamble your survival. I choose powder and lead.
#26 , in America you cant just go to the corner store and buy a full auto firearm. It requires a background check, $200 dollar tax stamp, and the WRITTEN permission of your local chief of police, county sheriff, or state District Attorney. On top of that, full auto firearms are ultra expensive.
Any time there is a shooting involving a full auto, authorities generally know who did it based on the registration rolls.
#27, your comment makes no sense. He could do the same thing with a butter knife. Want to ban those too? (you try buttering a bagel with a fork.)
#28 thanks for the clarification. I caught the gist of it, but "suppressive fire" sums it up very nicely.
EDIT: #26 if you dont care about my use of my weapons, why did you comment about it? As long as you dont break into my house intending to harm me or my family, you would never even see my guns let alone be assaulted by them. (unless you belong to the local shooting range, in which you STILL wouldnt care)
Criminals will always be criminals. If I was so inclined I could assault you with a rock from the ground. Common human respect is the answer to gun violence. I respect others and in return I receive respect. Whats so complicated about that?
#21 I disagree with your car comment. In it you seem to insinuate that guns have NO PURPOSE other than to murder. I would disagree. Hunting for sustenance is a pretty powerful reason for guns to exist, and before you say "well just use a bow and arrow then" I will point out that when its MY FAMILY that will starve when I miss the shot, I will use a gun that has a MUCH better chance at a successful second shot. Also, just because you have a gun doesnt mean your attacker will, and the opposite is true. just because you choose to be disarmed by your government, doesnt mean your potential attacker is also disarmed. Feel free to gamble your survival. I choose powder and lead.
#26 , in America you cant just go to the corner store and buy a full auto firearm. It requires a background check, $200 dollar tax stamp, and the WRITTEN permission of your local chief of police, county sheriff, or state District Attorney. On top of that, full auto firearms are ultra expensive.
Any time there is a shooting involving a full auto, authorities generally know who did it based on the registration rolls.
#27, your comment makes no sense. He could do the same thing with a butter knife. Want to ban those too? (you try buttering a bagel with a fork.)
#28 thanks for the clarification. I caught the gist of it, but "suppressive fire" sums it up very nicely.
EDIT: #26 if you dont care about my use of my weapons, why did you comment about it? As long as you dont break into my house intending to harm me or my family, you would never even see my guns let alone be assaulted by them. (unless you belong to the local shooting range, in which you STILL wouldnt care)
Criminals will always be criminals. If I was so inclined I could assault you with a rock from the ground. Common human respect is the answer to gun violence. I respect others and in return I receive respect. Whats so complicated about that?
25
Comment rated too low. Show this comment
34. equilibrium2x commented 13 years ago
#29 lucky for the rest of us, people like you also get drunk and shoot each other. or leave loaded guns around the house for their kids to shoot themselves. or their friends. survival of the fittest at its best...
+59 1. Break-a-leg commented 13 years ago
/sarcasm