Demonstrating evolution with a line

Interesting way of explaining the evolution of species. From BBC's 'Bang Goes the Theory' show.

Video size:

Reset to default size

Login to rate this video.

You can place this video on your website by inserting the (X)HTML code below:

Options:

pixels

pixels

Embed code:
<iframe src="http://www.snotr.com/embed/7811" width="400" height="330" frameborder="0"></iframe>

You can email this video to your friends by entering their addresses below:

Your information:

Recipients:

Add another recipient

Enter the two words you read above: Enter the numbers you hear:

Request another verification | Audible version | Visible version | More information


People who liked this video also liked

Fire department examination
Dont Stop Me Now
Secret Knock Detecting Lock
Norwegian blonde with chainsaw
Amazing Goshawk ability
Puzzling Puzzle Prank

Comments

19 comments posted so far. Expand all comments Login to add a comment.

Picture of imagic42 achievements

+25

1. imagic 3 years ago

great how such a duffucult subject is explained so simply !

Picture of cranky40 achievements

+21

2. cranky 3 years ago

This reminds me of the game chinese whispers that we used to play as kids. The first kid whispers something to the next kid's ear and the next does it again down the line. Finally the outcome was so much different than the original word that made us laugh so hard!

Picture of NotFirst33 achievements

+2

3. NotFirst 3 years ago

Looks like the line got..more degraded. Not more complicated. But hey, just observing. .

Picture of arcerhawk28 achievements

+5

4. arcerhawk 3 years ago

Blasphemy !!! O:)

Picture of Cloe40 achievements

+4

5. Cloe 3 years ago

#4 i hope you are trolling there!!!

Picture of Xionbox44 achievements

+6

6. Xionbox (moderator) 3 years ago

#3 Yes and no. "Degraded" is subjective. Being more "degraded" corresponds to more complicated. If the line is perfectly straight, it can be represented by a unique vector: two abstract points connected by a single line.
At the end of this experiment, there are much more lines, hence, you need much more vectors to go from the top of the screen to the bottom. Therefore, this is an evolution into a more complicated line.

Picture of loadrunner46 achievements

+2

7. loadrunner 3 years ago

It would be possible, drawing a curly line, and end up with a straight line at the end. but that's de-evolution. or isn't it?

Picture of cranky40 achievements

+2

8. cranky 3 years ago

#7 What comes to mind: Laws of thermodynamics, chaos theory, fractals. Because in this example we have the human factor I'd say it could be remotely possible!

Picture of ihateregistering22 achievements

0

9. ihateregistering 3 years ago

#7 Maybe that's like nowadays flightless bird-type creatures. (and if they had actually flown before)
But then again, the line wouldn't be the same..
I'd say theoretically possible..but in reality the conditions would have to be exactly the same and you still end up with so much randomness..

Picture of huldu30 achievements

+4

10. huldu 3 years ago

Tsk... everyone knows that God created man in his own image. It's in the bible and that is what is being taught in schools and by parents. Lovely isn't it. /sarcasm off.

Picture of OwenRay40 achievements

-8

11. Comment rated too low. Show this comment OwenRay 3 years ago

If the lines eventuale formed a beautiful van Gogh, now that would proof something.
imho this only discredits evolution.

Picture of Urihep38 achievements

+4

12. Urihep 3 years ago

The big question is: Who draw the first line?

Picture of senseishin28 achievements

+2

13. senseishin 3 years ago

#11

the idea is that if we allowed this experiment to go on for thousands (perhaps millions) of people, you would indeed, eventually get a beautiful van gogh or picasso... I've heard another interesting thought experiment.... if you have a thousand chimps randomly typing on a thousand typewriters... would they eventually reproduce shakespeare's hamlet?

probability suggests that, however diminutive the chances may be, they will eventually reproduce the entire play line by line.

In other words, OwenRay, 100 people is hardly a large enough sample is it? He kept mentioning millions of generations, not hundreds. That said, 100 people gets the idea across of how mutations and evolution occurs. Can't be so cynical or literal...

#12

interesting insight: thought-provoking at least... but the problem with the question which has also beleaguered philosophy is why we assume "who"

Perhaps the line was just always there just like the universe was always here before we were here... as Renee Descartes suggests with his famous "i think; therefore i am"... the "line" didn't exist until we called (thought) it a line, although it always existed. with our puny realization of self-existence and thought, we grant that the universe exists because we notice it... though it has always existed.

Put even more simply: does something exist because we say it exists or ask if it exists? Or has it always been, and we only failed to realize it existed until now?

The line metaphorically is atoms, molecules, simple and complex compounds... give enough time and they DO organize themselves into even more complex structures. Analogously, DNA, given time, "organizes" itself into even more complex sequences that can eventually express new genes.

Picture of Xionbox44 achievements

+1

14. Xionbox (moderator) 3 years ago

#13 Very interesting answer.

About the second part of your answer, having an observer is also a question which arises in quantum mechanics. There's a problem often referred to as the "quantum mind-body" problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind%E2%80%93body_problem#Observation_in_quantum_mechanics .

Picture of LQoQK36 achievements

+1

15. LQoQK 3 years ago

we were chimpanzees :O

good thing there was an error in the copying process or is it

Picture of Usdevildoggmc42 achievements

+1

16. Usdevildoggmc 3 years ago

Last time i commented on his video on here he was wearing the ugliest pink outfit I have ever seen... I see evolution has worked for him :D

(If u dont remember its the video where he boils n egg on newspaper.)

Picture of senseishin28 achievements

+1

17. senseishin 3 years ago

#14 thanks for that link.... very interesting. =)

Picture of medicino30 achievements

+2

18. medicino 3 years ago

#11 I think that the existence of people like you, is the only probable proof against evolution. >:) >:)

Picture of thundersnow29 achievements

0

19. thundersnow 1 year ago

#13 and #14, thank you for discussing this intelligently and sensibly. Enjoyed reading your viewpoints. :)