Black market nuke
There shoud be a category just for this: scary sh!t.
People who liked this video also liked
Comments
20 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.
54
4. loadrunner commented 12 years ago
But even in the computer games I play it is not that easy to get a nuke
49
6. LightAng3l commented 12 years ago
Bulgaria is my neighbour
20
8. ataneg commented 12 years ago
#7 well they do cover up...kind of
http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n279764
http://www.seesac.org/news/recent-news/1-192/
http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n279764
http://www.seesac.org/news/recent-news/1-192/
26
9. sidewinder commented 12 years ago
I am bulgarian and must tell you there is nothing like that. This is disgusting lie.
41
10. blue_alien commented 12 years ago
#7 ... And the people that do this kind of stuff are even willing to share their achievements, thus making it easier to be known.
#6 Hi neighbor!
#6 Hi neighbor!
20
11. ataneg commented 12 years ago
Hey #9 how do you know that?
They might have forgotten to inform you i guess
btw i am Bulgarian as well. And i find it quite strange that in the last 5 years 2 military ammo storage sites have blown up (quite probably purposely)
Chelopechene in 2008 and Sliven in 2012..
They might have forgotten to inform you i guess
btw i am Bulgarian as well. And i find it quite strange that in the last 5 years 2 military ammo storage sites have blown up (quite probably purposely)
Chelopechene in 2008 and Sliven in 2012..
26
12. ihateregistering commented 12 years ago
damn humans, you scary!
34
13. s1lent commented 12 years ago
LOL, being bulgarian myself, I feel obligated to comment on this one.
As shocking as this is, it seems a bit unreal to even myself. Bulgarian citizens are fully aware of all the mafia and corruption going on in the country, but it would never be to such a large scale; and even if it did, you would never find anyone talking so openly about it.
If this were a true interview, it would be all over the BBC + other major foreign news channels, not some programme that noone has ever heard of. I'm leaning more towards thinking that these guys are just looking for some shock value to make themselves recognised.
Think about it: would anyone selling nukes or dirty nukes as they call, admit that it is buried in their mother's back yard?
Come on now.
As shocking as this is, it seems a bit unreal to even myself. Bulgarian citizens are fully aware of all the mafia and corruption going on in the country, but it would never be to such a large scale; and even if it did, you would never find anyone talking so openly about it.
If this were a true interview, it would be all over the BBC + other major foreign news channels, not some programme that noone has ever heard of. I'm leaning more towards thinking that these guys are just looking for some shock value to make themselves recognised.
Think about it: would anyone selling nukes or dirty nukes as they call, admit that it is buried in their mother's back yard?
Come on now.
35
14. etplayer commented 12 years ago
This isn't about a nuke, it's about a dirty bomb. Why would the Soviets have bothered to make a dirty bomb when they have nukes? This makes absolutely no sense whatever. It's like saying the US Army has cobbled together a stash of Molotov Cocktails someplace. It's ridiculously stupid.
23
15. Mourialaid commented 12 years ago
we are not safe anywhere! ANYWHERE!
15
19. hantif commented 12 years ago
First off, a "dirty bomb" is not a nuke. It is a conventional explosive bomb used to spread radioactive material as a way of denying access to an area. To put it plainly, it is a terror weapon. There would be no nuclear yield involved. The correct term is "radiological weapon", not nuclear weapon.
Second, what they are showing is the detonator for a nuclear warhead. It may contain radioactive material, but not in sufficient quantities or form to allow a fission or fusion reaction to occur. Uranium or Plutonium are the common fuels for nuclear weapons, and the detonator would require neither. When you see a sphere or tube (implosion-pit or gun-tube design), then you should start to be worried about nuclear yield. There are also certain physical minimums of size and weight that need to be met before a nuclear reaction can occur.
Back before the Berlin Wall fell, I used to work on nuclear weapons, so I think I have a good grasp of what is involved.
Second, what they are showing is the detonator for a nuclear warhead. It may contain radioactive material, but not in sufficient quantities or form to allow a fission or fusion reaction to occur. Uranium or Plutonium are the common fuels for nuclear weapons, and the detonator would require neither. When you see a sphere or tube (implosion-pit or gun-tube design), then you should start to be worried about nuclear yield. There are also certain physical minimums of size and weight that need to be met before a nuclear reaction can occur.
Back before the Berlin Wall fell, I used to work on nuclear weapons, so I think I have a good grasp of what is involved.
+14 1. loadrunner commented 12 years ago