Base 12

Login to rate this video.

You can place this video on your website by inserting the (X)HTML code below:

Options:
pixels
pixels
Embed code:
<iframe src="https://www.snotr.com/embed/10355" width="400" height="330" frameborder="0"></iframe>

You can email this video to your friends by entering their addresses below:

Your information:
Recipients:

add Add another recipient

Human verification:

People who liked this video also liked

Turtles Love Watermelon!
Explosion in the clear ballistic gel ( Slow-Mo HD Video)
Aluminum and Mercury
JayWalking Citizenship Test (Jay Leno)
Surabaya International Kite Festival 2015 ( By Team Impian )
If the Universe is only 14 Billion years old, how can it be 92 Billion years Wide with a W

Comments

30 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.

Expand all comments

Picture of wongraven37 achievements

+5 1. wongraven commented 7 years ago

Totally crazy !!
Picture of SeanzBeanz28 achievements

+17 2. SeanzBeanz commented 7 years ago

Interesting analogy, I'll stick to my 10 digits though thank you very much :)
Picture of MrJaKoSe31 achievements

+1 3. MrJaKoSe commented 7 years ago

Well what if u subtract 2 from ur fingers? U cant cut of parts of ur finger or at least u wouldnt be able to count that often ;)

Nevertheless intersting video.
Picture of MakeTnotWar38 achievements

+27 4. MakeTnotWar commented 7 years ago

Now do a fifth in Duodezimal. It's 0.24972497....
Picture of txo49 achievements

+6 5. txo commented 7 years ago

I know a dude that has 6 fingers. But just in one hand :( He was a goalkeeper >:)
Picture of PaterSin42 achievements

+3 6. PaterSin commented 7 years ago

You can't start telling us about a system that makes more "sense" and then tell us that the imperial system is better than the metric one. That just doesn't work.
Picture of loadrunner54 achievements

+11 7. loadrunner commented 7 years ago

It is half past Duo. time for bed.
Picture of Chett24 achievements

+3 8. Chett commented 7 years ago

Who knew Lee Evans' twin was a mathematical guru :|
Picture of narf31 achievements

+4 9. narf commented 7 years ago

"There are people who think there should be 12 digits."

Yeah, I'm one of them :D.
Picture of banzemanga46 achievements

+6 10. banzemanga commented 7 years ago

#4 Or you can be Babylonian and have base 60 and be able to have a nice division against 5.
Picture of Tareim46 achievements

+5 11. Tareim (admin) commented 7 years ago

nice interesting concept though I can't ever see it catching on
Picture of Davorin25 achievements

+5 12. Davorin commented 7 years ago

It's good for exercise brain :-)
Picture of kaleemyork38 achievements

+2 13. kaleemyork commented 7 years ago

100% agree with #1
Picture of the_puiu45 achievements

+8 14. the_puiu commented 7 years ago

Newsflash: any serious programmer would tell you that they are using 16-base numbers daily (called hexadecimal system). What's that special with duodecimal? Do-do...
Picture of majais28 achievements

+5 15. majais commented 7 years ago

Numbers are as limiting as the measure of time or the idea of past, present and future. I'd say lets get rid of all of it! >:)
Picture of archis51 achievements

+7 16. archis commented 7 years ago

I think I stay ignorant in this topic. I assume if I would be risenin this system I would be a fan of it. I am an engineer, I like too to dived numbers with 3 and 4 with out some decimals. So what do I (we) do? We make lenghts who easaly devides with twelve. Steps or elements with size of 1200, 2400, 3600, 4800, 6000mm and so on are common to see.

By the way this man has huge eye pupils 8-)
Picture of PaterSin42 achievements

+4 17. PaterSin commented 7 years ago

#16 yes he does he might be on drugs, especially since they don't get smaller when he looks into the camera which ha a light on :D
Picture of Threeme218930 achievements

+1 18. Threeme2189 commented 7 years ago

I think that 100% should be replaced by 2520%, meaning that 1 = 2520%.
The reason being that 2520 is the smallest number that can be divided by 1-10.
Very convenient if you think about it.
No more 33.3333...% and so on.
Picture of Thanos34 achievements

+9 19. Thanos commented 7 years ago

#14 That would depend on what they do. I think base2 (binary) would still be the system of choice for programmers... even though base16 (hexadecimal) is widely used for color definition (god save CSS coders ^^)...

So let's do a short summary:
- By narrator's admission, this new system would do (close to) nothing for mathematics in general;
- All advantages would impact pretty much only elementary school kids;
- Two new symbols would have to be introduced and distributed (talk about messing up ASCII);
- One of the newly introduced symbols would be constantly mistaken for our favorite variable "x", while the other one would collide with the small epsilon, which is also employed in mathematics (most common used in calculus);

Somehow, this system appears to focus greatly on teaching basic mathematics to kids, which is an amazing thought, but somewhat disregards other levels/branches of mathematics, defeating the whole purpose of numeric system choice...
Picture of mebbe22 achievements

+4 20. mebbe commented 7 years ago

Very interesting, on a side note, this guy looks like he's popped a couple of pills
Picture of sp17625 achievements

+3 21. sp176 commented 7 years ago

@#4 Actually one-fifth is equal to 0.24 in this system. 1/5 = 12/60 = 2.4/12
Picture of huldu34 achievements

+2 22. huldu commented 7 years ago

Quite impressive. It all comes down to what we're taught is "right". It doesn't mean it's the right or the wrong way, it's what we know and what we were taught. Everything "evolves", even the way we think.
Picture of druzja132 achievements

+5 23. druzja13 commented 7 years ago

In Poland was a 12-base system:
12 - called TUZIN
5x12 = 60 - called KOPA
12x12 = 144 - called GROS

in USA too
1 FOOT = 12 INCH
Picture of glot21 achievements

+2 24. glot commented 7 years ago

The next day they'll want us to drive on the left side.
Picture of zurathan13 achievements

+4 25. zurathan commented 7 years ago

#21 no dude, #4 is right. you cant convert lover part of the fraction and leave the upper part, thats an insignificant math flaw. you may check it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal .belowly there is a huge table about this.
by the way the whole argument is not so necessary to contuniue.
computers thinks binary is better for them and they convert each calculation for us! there is no problem. if someone thinks this is easier, i dont mind them using it as long as they convert it to rest of the humankind. i cant imagine some one making his homework whit it without converting, definete F would the result. end of the argument.
Picture of LightAng3l49 achievements

+1 26. LightAng3l commented 7 years ago

In the real world, smart people use centimeters and kilograms, not inches and pounds :P You just add a 0 at the end with a metric system ... what is simpler than that? :S
Picture of WildMonkey32 achievements

0 27. WildMonkey commented 7 years ago

I use base 1.2, I use my penis and testicles to count.
Picture of bella131 achievements

+1 28. bella1 commented 7 years ago

ten is fine with me
Picture of sux2bu67 achievements

+3 29. sux2bu commented 7 years ago

#26 And how many of those countries with "smart people" have put men on the moon? It is all in what you grew-up being taught. ;)
Picture of gcleffff29 achievements

0 30. gcleffff commented 7 years ago

ill just go with what i know thats hard heheheh i like the dodo though :) dodo=breast in our language hahaha