Fracking explained

Login to rate this video.

You can place this video on your website by inserting the (X)HTML code below:

Options:
pixels
pixels
Embed code:
<iframe src="https://www.snotr.com/embed/11768" width="400" height="330" frameborder="0"></iframe>

You can email this video to your friends by entering their addresses below:

Your information:
Recipients:

add Add another recipient

Human verification:

People who liked this video also liked

Getting the Perfect Shot Nearly Costs Tourist His Life
Mother Cat Carrying Her Baby Kitten
1934 Assassination of King Alexander of Yugoslavia
Stuck at Home in an Albanian Blood Feud
Trucks without brakes | Runaway truck ramp
1981 Nadia Tour gymnastics Paul Hunt comedy uneven bars

Comments

17 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.

Expand all comments

Picture of loadme33 achievements

+34 1. loadme commented 8 years ago

This happens when lobby owns the politics.


Oh USA, its you again?
Picture of krillemaster46 achievements

+12 2. krillemaster commented 8 years ago

can we please stop with this crap and focus on making better and more effective solar cells and whatnot?
Picture of ImprsdBySmartVid29 achievements

+2 3. ImprsdBySmartVid commented 8 years ago

In France, today media says it gave 650.000 jobs to USA citizens. True or false? Who knows?
Implicitly, these french medias let french people think that giving the same authorization in France would give also many jobs in these time of high unemployment levels...
But I do understand it also mean undrinkable water in many places, possible cancer rise because of polluted areas and various other environmental damages, so I would prefer this technology not to be used.
Picture of dushan56 achievements

+5 4. dushan commented 8 years ago

#3 only issue we should consider starts around 2:46
this simply means that fracking is nothing but "cutting off the branch you're sitting on"
thanks, but no thanks
Picture of ImprsdBySmartVid29 achievements

+1 5. ImprsdBySmartVid commented 8 years ago

#4: You're right! "The contamination is so severe than the water could not even be clean in an treatment plant" :'( Maybe Americans thinks they have enough space to move to another place in this case. Or maybe they don't have enough space for democratic expression to let people reject fracking. At least, did they really got these 650.000 jobs? Or just one or two new billionaires?
Picture of sux2bu67 achievements
Comment rated too low. Show this comment

-9 6. sux2bu commented 8 years ago

The makers of this video aimed it at low-information people (like #1) to scare them into supporting their agenda. I bet most of you do not even realize that your country is also "fracking" for oil and natural gas.
Especially Canada,but also Germany and the UK and Ireland and Denmark and the Netherlands and many others have all been doing it for many years.The US uses the newest and most sophisticated and safe methods of any country.These drillings are thousands of feet below any water levels so drinking wells are not affected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing_by_country


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VY34PQUiwOQ#t=380
Picture of schlafanzyk35 achievements

+12 7. schlafanzyk commented 8 years ago

#6 The problem with industry tools like you is, that you pretend that these "safe" methods last forever and that continuing scientific studies don't matter, once something is deemed "safe" after intense lobbying efforts. The reality is, in the long term, the danger to the environment is much higher than any other energy source. Even nuclear power is more controllable, because plants can be maintained and improved through technological progress and the energy return rate is MUCH higher. I'm not a fan of nuclear energy, but considering climate change, it's the lesser of the evils. Fracking is even worse than coal. Nobody can fix the damage caused by hundreds if not thousands of deep underground chemical leaks. Some of the casings are failing already, even though they are supposed to last at least many decades. And even if they do, what happens then? At least stored nuclear waste can be relocated and reprocessed.
The fact that U.S. oil giants managed to even get their fangs on environmentally aware nations in Europe is not a pro argument. People here in Germany have been intentionally kept in the dark and there is no legal way to fight back, because almost everything is kept secret in terms of the health risks, ecological risks, etc. so there is no case to be made until the first disasters start unfolding and the chemicals start showing up in places they don't belong.
Picture of Tehnol36 achievements

+1 8. Tehnol commented 8 years ago

Prepare for unforeseen consequences
Picture of loadme33 achievements

0 9. loadme commented 8 years ago

it really doesn't matter if it gives 650.000 jobs to the USA.
how can you bring that even up? that is 0.26% of the population.
why should it be alright to have jobs that destroy countries? wtf?
Picture of hdwg40 achievements

+2 10. hdwg commented 8 years ago

This is on the internet so it must be true. Insert maniacal sarcastic laughter here.
Picture of LaoMa28 achievements

0 11. LaoMa commented 8 years ago

Not mentioned in the video: 98 - 99.5% of the fracking fluid is sand (i)
Picture of aquilon123424 achievements

0 12. aquilon1234 commented 8 years ago

how do you prepare for unforeseen consequences ?
Picture of Xionbox45 achievements

0 13. Xionbox (moderator) commented 8 years ago

#11 Actually, both this video and the "pro-frackling" video mention quite the contrary: 99% of fresh water. Should we remind everyone that a lot of places in the world don't have enough fresh water for people to drink?
Picture of sux2bu67 achievements
Comment rated too low. Show this comment

-5 14. sux2bu commented 8 years ago

#7 Alarmist bullcrap. The US and Canada have a very good safety record and spend tens of millions to make sure things are done right.
Go hug a tree.
Climate change?....

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/09/09/arctic-sea-ice-up-60-percent-in-2013/
Picture of glassweaver20 achievements

-2 15. glassweaver commented 8 years ago

#14 - While I don't disagree with you, I also don't disagree with #7. We were worried about 'global coooling' last century. Now it's global warming. But please don't embarass yourself by citing Fox News as a news source. That's like a Democrat citing MSNBC - or a North Korean citing their local media in an antiAmerican argument.

Want to talk about a GREAT form of energy? Look up LFTR.
Picture of sux2bu67 achievements

+1 16. sux2bu commented 8 years ago

#15 No embarrassment (proper spelling) here; if not for Fox News we would never have heard of the IRS illegally targeting conservative groups or the NSA illegally spying on our e-mails and cell phone calls or all the voter fraud from the Obama gang in the last two elections or all the other scandles the major "news" sources ignore. MSNBC praises Odumbo for his handling of the Syria problem while Putin ass-rapes Obama and makes the US look like a clown.
Fox was just reporting the findings that NASA just came out with,available from many news sources.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/Global-cooling-Arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html

http://notrickszone.com/2013/08/23/nasa-stumped-summer-arctic-ice-extent-among-highest-this-decade-antarctica-headed-toward-record-extent/
Picture of Tabur24 achievements

-2 17. Tabur commented 8 years ago

What ignorance... Cow farts produce FAR more methane that fracking (that's just ONE of the many, many half truths in this video)