About 4 feet long? I see its one feet long so

This is not only evidence that giants walked the earth. Since it is in granite, it also proofs that these giants lived more than 2000 m inside the earth, where they took walks on molten rock. Don't let the narrow minded erosionists tell you otherwise!

Some peeps will believe ANYTHING! ( of course, its on the interwebs so it MUST be true!)

Looks like God is flat-footed.
Seems to be more of an advertisement to increase tourism to South Africa.

Did he say, "between 200m and 3.5b years"? So, before most land animals, and before atmospheric oxygenation – right.

and "scientists" - what scientists? Geologists? or christian pseudo-scientists?

Oh, and a footprint in Granite – yeah, sure.

I'll tell you exactly what happened here. Sure this is the shape of a human foot, therefore any shape found on a rock that looks like a human foot is going to be thought of as a footprint. Just the same as faces have been seen on the moon because the shape of two circles in a triangle with an elongated shape below makes us think of a human face. The fact that this face is several hundred miles across is incidental.

Going back to this foot shaped vertical object which has been in the rock for 3+ billion years and no doubt first seen by humans several million years ago, there will have been many opportunities to add, chip or scrape away to produce the toes, these days we would call it graffiti usually associated with the younger generation. How many generations of teenagers do you think will have grown up in this area over the last one million years never mind since the beginning of human kind.

Of course it is much simpler to call it the foot of God or a giant. what would have been the evolutionary point in a guy over 30 feet high

#5 Blasphemy! Earth is 6000 years old!

#6 The fact that there is a face imprinted on the moon just shows that these giants where huge enough to bang their head against it.

Footprints are left in sedimentary rocks not granite that is formed where man or beast do not tread because they can't exist. This is asinine and Michael Tellinger should go back and finish middle school.

Has anyone noticed that this print is vertical (on a 'wall'), not horizontal (in the ground)? Did they walk vertically as in defying gravity or did they have advanced climbing equipment?

Oh for god's sake #10. Have you not heard of geology?
Nice imprint, but for anyone to claim that it's evidence for twenty-feet-tall people they would need to provide other evidence. All evidence is that our predecessors were small. This is therefore either something completely new that science has willingly discounted, or it's a fake (in which case I congratulate the forgers), or it's a spurious coincidence.
I'm with #6 Judge-Jake on this - graffiti. Clever graffiti, but graffiti nonetheless, not genuine, and certainly not worth the price of a ticket to SA. Nor a trek up a mountain.
And which "geologists" have marvelled at it? Name names...

Adam was 90 feet (60 cubits) tall (u're welcome to rate down)

This video made me think about the combination of these two classic clips:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzlCdWwYn2I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z-OLG0KyR4

I walk every day after work with my two Huskys between 5 and 7.4 miles with 980 feet

The guy in the video walks like 0.006 miles, and afterwards he can barely breathe he is so exhausted...

but thx for the video, the giant foot print is amazing

thank you #13 for this incredible banana link