Now... Touch the barrel you pussy!

pretty cool you can get a skin for that gun in CS

That can't be good for the barrel

I want one

P.S. Im not a redneck, honest!

I'm surprised the thing didn't melt!! Cool but completely useless and totally redneck!
1 Monkey Head for ingenuity and coolness factor

You want guns in your society, you have guns in your society, now all of you yanks forfeit the right to ever complain when you get shot while just going about your daily business, ok? On the flip side, I won't complain when I have nothing to fire at invading armies. I know which is more likely.

Lame.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEu9LLQpOF8

The point of the Glock is to put it in yr pocket.

#(removed comment) you have to have a gun license to own a gun, unlike america where they sell guns to anyone, in australia we would like to keep the guns out of serial killers hands, out of mental retards.

There is no point to owning a gun if no one else has them. that is what is good about australia its safe.

the right to life will always trump the ability for every idiot/racist/drunk/druggo/mental retard to own a gun. if you want to play army, join the army

Didn't mean that last part! was brain storming and meant to erase

Pretty cool: 8 monkeys. /10

wow!!! nice, i wunt one toO!

#(removed comment) I think what #10 was trying to say that if the drug-crazed home invader doesn't have a gun himself, then you won't really need a gun to stop him..

A society will only go as bad as are the rules it is governed by..

I think that the obvious connection between U.S gun-laws and it's absurd crime-rate is not very hard to piece together

I do think that there should be a licensing system set up for the US.
I would be willing to sacrifice convenience to make it harder for criminals to get their hands on guns.
Although there will always be a black market for guns.

i like it where can i buy one there is a dog on lake garden city udon thani thailand that would sleep a lot better with a gut full
john brook www.udonthani.co.uk

I'm just trying to point out that a gun in his hand will more probably lead an uneducated poor fool to crime than if it was prohibited by law.. by god, the statistics have proven it many times over..

Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't most of the incidents described above political/governmental (and domestic war) incidents? Are you telling me that if the (a crude example) US government and army decided to start exterminating US civilians, then they could actually fend for themselves, because they have the ''liberty'' to carry firearms? Come on...

This amendment might have had some reasonable basis to stand upon back in it's day when USA was still largely country-side, trouble with Natives or whatnot.. It is clear, right now this law is only making things worse for you guys...

No.. we don't.. we get our laughs and entertainment from seeing people, having parties, READING BOOKS etc.. You know.. the 'geeky' solution

Quote [The second amendment to our constitution was added just for the reason that if our gov became tyrannical then the 'people' could take a stand against it as was done when the Americans booted King George's army and politicians out of our country.]
->
wouldn't you say that that amendment has defeated its purpose then, by now?

Quote [We just do our best to lock-up the predators who commit crime.]
->
yup.. the US penal institution holds more people by now than is the total population of my country, plus 2 of my neighboring countries (the Baltic states) combined..

here in Ohio ( USA ) you only need to register a gun if its A) a concealed carry weapon and B) if its fully automatic.

I own 3 guns, none of which are registered in my name, none of which are illegal according to federal statutes.

#(removed comment) ---> "If our gov tried to use our own military against the populace you would see the military turn against the gov."


when the US enforces their implanted microchip (the dog chip) law, that will become very difficult. If rumors are correct, they are already implanting the military. Who knows what kind of control they will have (or already have).

+1 for the rednecks

#(removed comment) man you never heard of google? look up the words "verichip" , "RFID" and "Radio Frequency Identification"



but your right about one thing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pxjnl1yuXk&feature=related

and by the way, i know "the dog chip" might make you confused with dog tags, but what i was referring to was the fact that RFID tags, aka, the mark of the beast, are sold to the general public for implanting into animals like dogs

#(removed comment) its obvious you didn't google those keywords i told you, otherwise you wouldn't still be debating this. below are three links to videos of major news tv stations talking about it which is about 15 minutes total. i hope that makes your task of proper research less tedious.


the first video is from one major news station it talks about some of the dangerous side effects (3:33 min):

effects:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQMby-z7tGk


the second video has more videos from major news television channels (4:31):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dpj4HRmJFiU



the third video has some historical videos and more news videos (6:40):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKx1gLCQef8



so are you going to sacrifice 15 minutes of your life and admit to defeat or what?

furthermore, i think you will find this one interesting:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlRrr4Gpz2E&feature=related

#(removed comment) whatever dude, you didnt seem to know about implanted microchips when you misunderstood what i was talking about and got rfid tags confused with

"science fiction" and medical dog tags (as stated in comment #(removed comment)).

on a further note, i never once said that rfid tags have "control" over people in the means of "mind control". (although one of those vid links i

showed later may have implied ) when i say: "Who knows what kind of control they will have (or already have)." (as stated in comment #20 , i mean

exactly what i said. you shouldn't put words peoples mouths by claiming that i "imply" or that i "said" something which i did not. if you could,

refer back to a comment where i actually said or impied this


btw, for your information gps location, product/person identification and banking are all forms of control when it comes to implanted microchips. the

government also "control" people (non implant) by creating laws and regulations. you dont call that "control"? or perhaps your definition of

"control" is limited to mind control" (in which case, it would be you who watches too much science fiction).



some vids for you about implanting troops:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRveSffxPdI

oh, and youll love this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYUlCKFHeAQ&feature=related




for future reference, before you decide to trash what someone says, make sure you know what you are talking about!

yeah, and there's more.. on control and laws

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiJH8R-z-mA

as the saying goes:

you can bring a horse to water, but you cant make it drink.

---> "CHECK!"


#(removed comment) first of all oldfart, im an expert chess player. which means i think many moves in advance, ive got a lot of tricks up my sleeve and i love a hard game. you saying check mate means absolutely nothing to me and certainly doesn't prove me wrong


1: lets get this clear: i stated that the law will be enforced, i never stated that it currently exists. the us have plans for many laws which currently do not exist. personally, i don't like the idea of implanted microchips. however, i am not going ignore it. personally, i believe they have plans for a law and yes it might be a rumor. obviously im not going to convince you otherwise because most people believe what they want to believe.

i WANT to believe that you are right, however, corrupt agendas and world history has shown that human nature is greedy, malicious, sinister and controlling. history will always repeat itself because people refuse to acknowledge history.

furthermore, i find it funny how you refuse to believe in the possibility that a law could be created for enforcing microchip implanting. the us create all kinds of laws concerning security related devices, in my opinion, the rfid tag is the holy grail of security devices. or is it "science fiction".


2: interesting point but a "sane" person would not take a "sane" comment and assume that it says something "insane". i can see how you could get confused by assuming that government having control over military personnel could only mean "physical control". there is multiple ways they could have control which might prevent retaliation (keep in mind, because i know how you like to assume alot, these methods are theoretical from a mechanical engineers point of view and do not imply actual systems or technologies): 1; rfd tags could provide gps location which might help track oppostion so that counter attacks could be executed (counter attacks could even be disguised as training operations). 2; people or military personnel could be shut off from the ability to buy or sell products if the rfid tags eventually replaced money, which is necessary to survive. 3; rdif tags could potentially identify people, as well as what possessions a person might be carrying if the possessions also contain rfid tags. this could give rfid controllers a strategic advantage.

a lot of Americans have ancestry heritage from Europe, which means that biologically they no different. when Hitler invaded Europe, little was done until the us came in with superior military systems and defeated them.

also, all of the people positioned within high ranking military organizations are likely to have interest in a: military weapons development, b: a global agenda for world conquest. it would take some kind of mass cooperation with all members of the military for there to be a successful retaliation.

besides, the government wont openly turn on the population because it is much easier for them to manipulate their way to conquest.


3: if you watched the video from start to finish and actually paid attention to what was being shown, you would have seen how rfid tags could be used to control aggression and other emotions. i get what you are trying to say, but i added that one because you fist mentioned the assumption of having "control" over a person. exact quote: "You indicate that the chip may have 'control' over the implanted person which of course it could not." is that enough "control" for ya? you should fast forward to the part which shows a cybernetics professor who attached an implant to his nervous system.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKx1gLCQef8


4: you are correct. vericip will make billions (or more) from this. why wouldn't they want to do that? and you are also right that the videos don't show the pentagon saying that they are implanting troops. do you honestly think that they will tell you everything they are doing? the videos actually are just to show that news media have covered the topic of "implanting troops" regardless if they are speculations and proposals. for future reference, because i know you like to assume, the actual quote i said was "some vids for you about implanting troops:". when i make a comment, i mean exactly as i say, not what you assume i meant


5: first of all, the read id act does not go into detail about possible verichip laws (to avoid assumption ), however, it opens up a doorway for countless other similar laws to be created or implemented.

according to the wikipedia article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REAL_ID_Act ) "As of April 2, 2008, all 50 states have either applied for extensions of the original May 11, 2008 compliance deadline or received unsolicited extensions, meaning that the REAL ID Act will not become an issue at federal facilities and airports until December 31, 2009" this means that the act is postponed, thus explaining why "it is November 2008 and no such law or requirement has been instituted."

you'll like this vid... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCU2OJPZ4AM


6: "The chip which is about twice the size of any grain of rice that I have ever seen" the image you are probably talking about is actually a photograph of an older model. there is one that is almost identical to the size of a grain of rice and even one the size of a pinhead for tracking products.

"Are you a US citizen?" ----> to answer your question i am. to avoid confusion, i both love and support America and the existence an American government. i also support the world and believe in a future one world government. i do not support tyranny and corruption, no matter where it manifests.

i agree with you on the possibility of easy removal or deactivation but i don't know how.

it may be voluntary, but as history has shown, a devastating act like 9/11 can give dictators the power to do anything they want.


"sometimes you have to use a 2 x 4 to get the mule's attention." <------lol, likewise

to be honest dude, i really don't care what you think. it doesn't matter what i say because you will always debate it whether you are right or wrong.

don't expect a reply to this anymore because i already made my point and im finished wasting my time debating with you.

#(removed comment) lol hahahaha inventory tracking software can do the same thing but cheaper

#(removed comment) Great (and accuarate) information on gun control. Thanks for the video too.