Multiple local news stations say the same thing verbatim

Login to rate this video.

You can place this video on your website by inserting the (X)HTML code below:

Options:
pixels
pixels
Embed code:
<iframe src="https://www.snotr.com/embed/20877" width="400" height="330" frameborder="0"></iframe>

You can email this video to your friends by entering their addresses below:

Your information:
Recipients:

add Add another recipient

Human verification:

People who liked this video also liked

F/A-18F Carrier Break
Lion Pride Try to Slay a Full-Grown Giraffe
Ozzy Man Reviews: People F#%ked Up By Bulls
ANIMALS and POWER OF MUSIC
Super Speed Rolled Omelette - Korean Food
Transforming Air Into Pure Drinking Water Is Finally Possible, Here’s How

Comments

7 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.

Expand all comments

Picture of ComentAtor48 achievements

+4 1. ComentAtor commented 70 days ago

this is extremely dangerous to our democracy! google says that these local stations have the same owner - Sinclair Broadcast Group
Picture of krazeeeyez38 achievements

+3 2. krazeeeyez commented 70 days ago

#1. Something tells me "Sinclair Broadcast Group" may well be.. Extremely Dangerous to our Democracy!
Picture of RobertTusk15 achievements

+1 3. RobertTusk commented 69 days ago

US journalism was already in poor shape after Reagan.
Clinton's 1996 telecommunications act finished it off.
US media was sold to corporations.
6 corporations now own most of the media so the agenda is not journalism but profit - by any means necessary.
That is why the US general population is pretty clueless about what s going on.
Picture of snotraddict44 achievements

-3 4. snotraddict commented 69 days ago

#3 is it profit driven or agenda driven when the majority of political donations from media is given to Democrat candidates?
Picture of trancetunes48 achievements

+1 5. trancetunes (moderator) commented 68 days ago

#4 yet another moron living in a small bubble of democrat republican political spectrum...lol...i highly doubt #1, #2, or #3 care for either party if they are even from the united states.

Both of those parties are full of right wing sociopaths..
Picture of thundersnow58 achievements

+1 6. thundersnow commented 68 days ago

#4 You taking over for sux, bashing Democrats..lol
Picture of snotraddict44 achievements

0 7. snotraddict commented 68 days ago

#5 and #6, it's actually a serious question with actual facts. You can bash me personally all you want, I can take it, but for actual dialogue among adults, I am curious.

Sure, "news" is for profit but when everyone is in lock-step, what is the underlying motive? Is there one, or is it pure laziness?
I'm not sure.

But you have to admit that if the media that so many people get their info from (and their opinions); would it be a healthy relationship that it seems to side mostly with one party when they're supposed to be neutral?

#6 "taking over for sux", did sux go somewhere? Admittedly I do like to poke the cat once in a while with regards to Democrats ;), but know that my personal feeling is both parties are abhorrent and I hate politicians pretty much across the board.

#5 specifically, nope the same moron you've called out before. :D As a moderator on a site that's barely hanging in there, you may want to read carefully (I didn't mention 1 or 2) and maybe grow some skin. Bashing your viewers personally (which you seem to do often ) may not be the best strategy for the longevity of the site. By definition a moderator does preside over, but the root word, moderate is defined as: "make or become less extreme, intense, rigorous, or violent.";)>:) Perhaps chill a little and enjoy the show. We can disagree and be respectful.