wow.... i would like to see that in 3D.

Explosion without flames?
Maybe the same technique with the movie Inception.

#2 yeah they should have thrown in a gallon or two of gasoline for effect.

Have fun explaining this to your insurance....

That gave me wood.

Crazy Norwegians !

Too bad for the failing tripod!

omg its like the shrapel is comming right at me!!!

#1 I would prefer super slow motion with bullet proof glass in front of it, I would hate for any to lose such fantastic equipments.

Slight case of "overkill".....but IMPRESSIVE !

I can see the headlines reading, Bomb detonated by "splinter group".

That was do dangerous... And awesome

#2 Gasoline explodes with a fire ball, unlike the dynamite. although, the dynamite have more shock-wave effect

Go Norway!

Yeah, sure, they made a lot of firewood... but good luck gathering it all up!

Title should read: John's attempt to light his own fart goes disasterously wrong

#2 Explosions of that size don't have flames, except their fake Hollywood versions that are really just rapidly lit fires, and not explosions at all. It's simply a solid converting rapidly to a gas, pushing a lot of stuff out of the way in the process.

"Explosions of that size don't have flames"

#17. You've obviously never heard of gas explosions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyMbaZ9FVjA

Title should just say..... Blowing up a house with Dynamite....


Someone's going to have some splinters

#18 First, that gas pipe explosion was huge. Second, the fire was caused by (wait for it) the gas. I saw it glowing in the night sky from my front porch, a bit less than 6 miles away, at the time it happened.

But ..... for the explosion served ...??

sucks to collect all those up to burn later