Superior Motion Control

Some pretty impressive robot arms.

Video size:

Reset to default size

Login to rate this video.

You can place this video on your website by inserting the (X)HTML code below:

Options:

pixels

pixels

Embed code: 
<iframe src="http://www.snotr.com/embed/3214" width="400" height="330" frameborder="0"></iframe>

You can email this video to your friends by entering their addresses below:

Your information:

Recipients:

Add another recipient


This video has, amongst others, been embedded on www.hiroiro.com (more info).

Comments

20 comments posted so far. Login to add a comment.

rated -19

1 Comment rating too low, click to show Posted 30 days ago by Zmagec

So...
What will you use this machine for ? i hope not this because this is just pointless :|

rated +22

2 Posted 30 days ago by sux2bu

#(removed comment) Of course the cans are fixed in place,otherwise the speed and tilt of the trays would throw them off. But that does not diminish the awesome finesse and agility the robots display in their movements.

rated +9

3 Posted 30 days ago by hedosean

8-) #2 - Especially when you consider the speed and ease of programming. If you know anything about robotics or CNC programming then you will recognize what a technological and performance leap this is. Besides that the shear physics of this are pretty amazing. How many axes are we talking about here anyway?

rated -4

4 Comment rating too low, click to show Posted 30 days ago by Louie

I'm glad they told me they added another robot, I probably wouldn't have noticed. No matter how technical they get with their robots, they still can't watch snotr. :D

rated -4

5 Comment rating too low, click to show Posted 30 days ago by MoT

1mm? Looks more like 1cm. Cool vid tho.

rated -12

6 Comment rating too low, click to show Posted 30 days ago by Cavabardus

Superior waste of programming.
Brought to you by B.O.R.ing

(sorry)

rated +3

7 Posted 30 days ago by harrold895

Do the roboboogie

rated +3

8 Posted 30 days ago by CorpseGrinder

thx #2 and #3
I think so many people just don´t get what this technology could do...
and those people will be the first in line for a robotic operated surgery...

rated 0

9 Posted 30 days ago by erg5hp

admit it. you wish your girlfriend could do this.

rated +1

10 Posted 29 days ago by Gringo_el_Diablo

Everybody thinks it's not amazing since we're acclimated to robot arms creating CARS!

You cannot compare the difference between the 2. This shit seems childish but very impressive.

rated -5

11 Comment rating too low, click to show Posted 29 days ago by jftvrwk

booooooooring

rated +3

12 Posted 29 days ago by stevend1711

They always said robots would take our jobs eventually. Damn, I was just getting good at passing a nail between a tray full of drink cans at rapid pace. Now what am I going to do?

not rated

13 Posted 29 days ago by thundercash

Can they drive my car in the same exact way :D

rated +3

14 Posted 29 days ago by sux2bu

#12 Don't let it get you down,I bet they will still need humans to grease the robot's joints! >:)

not rated

15 Posted 29 days ago by Urmensch

Forget the monkey butler, I want a robot one.

rated -1

16 Posted 29 days ago by badboy007

cool but pointless

not rated

17 Posted 29 days ago by Usdevildoggmc

I want to see nano-bots in action Damn-it! 8-)

rated +2

18 Posted 28 days ago by MiNo

That robot is equivalent to a whole sweatshop in China >:)

rated -2

19 Comment rating too low, click to show Posted 26 days ago by TechnoKING

#5 is right...this is amazingly impressive, but the FMG that made this video for the company is making the engineers look like idiots by claiming that was one millimeter...centimeter is more like it. damn fmgs...amazing accuracy and repeatability on those robots however... 8-)

rated +2

20 Posted 22 days ago by USAnumber1

#5 & #19 1cm = .390 of an inch which is more than 3/8's of an inch. At 0:44 you can clearly see the clearance between the rod and can is more like 1mm or .039 of an inch. I do not think it is the engineers who are looking like idiots in this case.